|
Introduction
This report details the Bank’s compensation policy for Directors and Key Management Personnel and the links between the performance of the Bank and individual compensation outcomes. Compensation arrangements, including details of equity holdings, loans and other transactions for Directors and Key Management Personnel of the Bank, are also disclosed. In compiling this report the Bank has met the disclosure requirements of accounting standard AASB124 as well as those prescribed by the Corporations Act 2001.
Changes since 2005
Changes arising from revision of Accounting Standards
The 2005 Remuneration Report was compiled in accordance with the disclosure requirements of accounting standard AASB1046 as well as those prescribed by the Corporations Act 2001. Following publication of the 2005 Report, AASB1046 was replaced by AASB124.
The key differences in reporting under the revised AASB124 are:
-
Disclosure of compensation for ‘Key Management Personnel’ as opposed to ‘Specified Executives’ previously. AASB1046 defined a ‘Specified Executive’ as someone who is directly accountable and responsible for the strategic and operational management of an organisation. In 2005, the Bank was required to disclose details of compensation for the five employees, excluding Directors, with the greatest authority in this area. The Bank took the view that all members of its Executive Committee have significant influence over the strategic direction of the Bank, and accordingly defined all nine of its Group Executives as Specified Executives for disclosure purposes. This approach is consistent with the definition of Key Management Personnel required under AASB124, used in compiling the 2006 report;
-
Changes in the sub-categories of compensation that are reported. AASB124 requires the breakdown to be in five categories – short term benefits, post-employment benefits, other long term benefits, termination benefits and share-based payments. This differs from AASB1046 which required four categories – primary benefits, post employment benefits, equity benefits and other benefits; and
-
AASB124 requires the Bank to use a fair value calculation to determine the value of reward shares to be disclosed for each Executive. The fair value approximates the number of shares that are expected to vest in the participants over the expected vesting period. This has resulted in changes in the calculation of long term incentives (LTI) values being disclosed since 2004/05, including some negative values for Executives who forfeited their entitlements to reward shares upon exiting the Bank.
Long Term Incentive (LTI) design change – Equity Reward Plan (ERP)
In 2006 the Bank reviewed and will implement the following changes to ERP design features for future grants:
-
Restriction of re-testing from four occasions to one occasion, 12 months after initial testing, at which time a maximum of 50% only of the original grant may vest; and
-
The use of a straight line vesting scale with 50% vesting at the 51st percentile, through to 100% vesting at the 75th percentile. Previous vesting commenced when Bank performance met the 50th percentile, with 100% vesting at the 75th percentile, but the scale was tiered with accelerated straight line vesting where performance exceeded the 67th percentile.
People & Remuneration Committee
The Bank’s compensation arrangements are overseen by the People & Remuneration Committee of the Board, which currently consists of Mr R J Clairs (Chairman), Mr A B Daniels, Ms S C H Kay and Dr J M Schubert. The Committee’s activities are governed by its terms of reference which is available on the Bank’s website at http://shareholders.commbank.com.au.
The Committee considers changes in compensation policy likely to have a material impact on the Bank and is informed of leadership performance, legislative compliance on employment issues, industrial agreements and incentive plans operating across the Bank.
The Committee also considers senior appointments and compensation arrangements for senior management. The full Board approves the compensation arrangements, performance reviews and talent reviews for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Group Executives (senior direct reports to the CEO), as outlined in the Corporate Governance Statement.
The policy of the Board is that the Committee shall consist entirely of independent Non-Executive Directors. The CEO attends Committee meetings by invitation but does not attend in relation to matters that can affect him.
Compensation Policy
The Bank’s compensation systems complement and reinforce its performance culture, leadership and talent management systems. The compensation systems aim to:
-
Attract and retain high calibre employees;
-
Align individual and Bank goals; and
-
Ensure total compensation is competitive by market standards. Fixed compensation is generally set at the market median and total compensation up to the 75th percentile for performance. In this regard the Bank is careful not to generate upward pressure on the market.
For Executives, this also aims to reward with an appropriate mix of compensation according to their level in the organisation, with a significant weighting towards both short term and long term variable (‘at risk’) pay linked to performance. This weighting increases at higher levels in the organisation. This focus aims to:
-
Reward Executives for Bankwide, business unit and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks and against behavioural standards;
-
Align the interests of Executives with those of shareholders; and
-
Link Executive reward with the strategic goals and sustainable performance of the Bank.
In determining appropriate levels of Executive compensation, the People & Remuneration Committee engages an external consultant to provide independent advice. This ensures that the compensation of Executives is set competitively compared to the market. It also helps the Committee understand movements and trends in Executive compensation that should be factored into considerations regarding the compensation of Executives.
Compensation and terms and conditions of employment are specified in an individual contract of employment with each Executive, which is signed by the Executive and the Bank.
Compensation Structure
Compensation of the Bank’s Executives consists of three key elements:
The ‘mix’ of these components for each Executive varies according to their role, as outlined below.
The following diagram illustrates the annual cycle of the Bank’s compensation arrangements for senior executives.

The following table generally summarises the eligibility of each compensation element by Employee Group.

Fixed Compensation
Fixed compensation consists of base compensation (which is calculated on a total cost basis and includes any FBT charges related to employee benefits including motor vehicles) as well as employer contributions to superannuation.
Fixed compensation is competitively set so that the Bank can attract, motivate and retain high calibre local and international Executives.
Fixed compensation is reviewed annually by the People & Remuneration Committee through a process that considers relevant comparative compensation in the market and internal and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices. As noted above, the Committee has access to external advice independent of management
Variable (‘At Risk’) Compensation
The relationship of fixed and variable compensation (potential short term and long term incentives) is approved for each level of executive management by the People & Remuneration Committee.
The Bank’s compensation structure is designed to motivate employees for quality short and long term performance. The mix between short term and long term variable components maintains a focus on the sustainable short term performance of the Bank, whilst ensuring a clear line of sight in positioning the Bank for its longer term success.
The current target mix of compensation components for Executives is illustrated in the following table.

Where market practice requires, the structure for some specialist (high revenue-generating) roles differs from that which applies generally to Executive management. For such specialists, a greater proportion of the variable component of compensation may be in short term rather than long term incentives but the overall mix of compensation is still heavily weighted towards ‘at risk’ pay.
Short Term Incentive (STI) Arrangements
Employees at all levels of the Bank participate in STI arrangements.
Actual STI payments for Executives depend on the extent to which operating targets and behaviour standards set at the beginning of the financial year are met.
Depending on the Executive’s level within the organisation, any actual STI payments received are based on a combination of Bankwide, business unit and individual performance.
On an annual basis, after consideration of performance against Key Result Areas, the Board approves an overall performance rating for the Bank and each business unit. The Executive’s manager assesses individual performance based on the Bank’s Performance Feedback and Review (Performance Management) system.
Executives generally do not receive a performance payment if their individual performance is not ‘meeting expectations’. Such situations would be under active performance management.
The aggregate of annual STI payments available for Executives across the Bank is subject to the approval of the People & Remuneration Committee. In the case of the CEO and Group Executives, individual payments are subject to the approval of the Board. For payments made in recognition of performance for the year ended 30 June 2006, where STI deferral applies, the STI payments are delivered in two components –
-
50% paid as immediate cash payment; and
-
50% in cash deferred for one year. Generally, the Executive will need to be an employee of the Bank at the end of the deferral period to receive this portion.
Long Term Incentive (LTI) Arrangements
Under the Bank’s Equity Reward Plan (ERP), LTI grants to Executives are delivered in the form of ordinary shares in the Bank that vest in the Executive if and to the extent that a performance hurdle is met.
LTI grants are made to Executives who are able to directly influence the generation of shareholder wealth and thus the Bank’s performance against the relevant hurdle. Participation is thus restricted to Executives who, in a reporting sense, are no more than three levels removed from the CEO.
The quantum of grants made to each Executive depends on their level within the organisation and has regard to the desired mix between fixed compensation, short term and long term incentive as well as the performance and potential of the individual Executive.
The Bank’s LTI plans do not allow the participants to hedge their exposure to unvested shares or reduce the risk associated with the performance hurdles in any way. The Bank has never put in place any enablers to facilitate hedging arrangements.
No value will accrue to the Executive unless the Bank’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) at least meets the 51st percentile of a peer comparator group of companies over a three to four year period. This was the 50th percentile prior to the 2006 grant. The percentage of shares vesting in the Executive rises with increased performance. To receive the full value of the LTI grant, the Bank’s performance must be in the top quartile of the peer group.
The ERP arrangements represent a restriction of re-testing from the previous four occasions to one occasion, 12 months after initial testing, at which time a maximum of 50% only of the original grant may vest.
The table below provides a summary of the ERP grants from previous years that were in operation during the year ended 30 June 2006.

The use of a relative TSR based hurdle ensures an alignment between comparative shareholder return and reward for Executives.
In assessing whether the performance hurdles for each grant have been met, the Bank receives independent data from Standard & Poor’s which provides both the Bank’s TSR growth from the commencement of each grant and that of the peer group (excluding the Bank). The Bank’s performance against the hurdle is then determined by ranking each company in the peer group and the Bank in order of TSR growth from the commencement of each grant. A weighting for each company in the peer group is determined by dividing the market capitalisation of the relevant company by the total market capitalisation of the peer group. The Bank’s percentile ranking is determined by aggregating the calculated weighting of each company ranked below the Bank.
The peer group chosen for comparison reflects the Bank's business mix and currently consists of:
| Adelaide Bank |
Macquarie Bank |
| AMP |
National Australia Bank |
| Australia & New Zealand Banking Group |
QBE Insurance |
| AXA |
St George |
| Bank of Queensland |
Suncorp-Metway |
| Bendigo Bank |
Westpac Banking Group |
| IAG |
|
The Bank is excluded from this group.
Further details of the ERP may be found in Note 33 to the Financial Statements.
Bank Performance
Short Term Performance – 2005/2006
The Bank’s Short Term Incentive framework is underpinned by a performance management system through which all staff are assessed on outcomes and behaviours. Staff have common Key Result Areas in Customer Service, People Engagement and Business Outcomes. All executives of the Bank in roles of General Manager and above are assessed in relation to a ‘Special Task’ / Project which is designed to ensure continuing focus beyond business as usual and to enhance Bankwide collaboration.
Within the Key Result Areas, particular emphasis is given to the Bank’s four strategic priorities of Customer Service, Business Banking, Technology and Operational Excellence and Trust and Team Spirit when assessing performance.
Below is a description of the Bank’s performance in each of the Key Result Areas.
Summary of Bank Performance
| Key Result Area |
Commentary |
| Customer Service |
The Bank’s vision is ‘to be Australia’s finest financial services organisation through excelling in customer service’. The Bank has made progress as a result of the Which new Bank program, through enhanced customer turnaround times, the implementation of CommSee and CommServe, further branch refurbishments and, more recently, the introduction of new products, removal of transaction fees from NetBank and the opening of some branches on Saturdays for convenient banking.
In March 2006 the Bank announced an evolutionary strategic direction for the next phase of the Bank’s development. The strategy draws on the Bank’s strengths and attributes and identifies areas of opportunity and brings together these two elements to ensure customers benefit in a way that is important to them.
It is expected that the impact during 2006/2007 of service initiatives already completed and being implemented will add further to the Bank’s competitiveness, customer satisfaction levels and ultimately the Bank’s market share in profitable areas. |
| People Engagement |
There have been solid people engagement improvements driven from the Which new Bank program.
This result is supported by enhanced employee satisfaction readings, key culture change measures, a continuing safety improvement focus and the implementation of enhanced leadership, performance management and talent management frameworks.
This progress is reflective of the Bank’s commitment to its people. The evolutionary strategy builds on the success of the Which new Bank program and includes a strategic priority relating to Trust and Team spirit. Through strengthening leadership, developing and valuing our people and working collaboratively business performance will be lifted and growth will continue. |
| Business Outcomes |
The Bank exceeded its net profit after tax (NPAT) targets for the year ended 30 June 2006. Cash NPAT increased by 16% compared to the prior year. This result includes the profit from the sale of the Hong Kong insurance business of $145 million. Excluding this item, cash NPAT increased 12%. Underlying NPAT also increased by 12%.
All Which new Bank market commitments were either met or exceeded.
The result was delivered through strong performances across the business driven by strong growth in Banking Income. Fund flows and investment returns have also been strong, insurance growth has been good and productivity continues to improve.
|
The following graphs illustrate the Bank’s NPAT and earnings per share (EPS) performance on a cash basis over the last five years. The graphs note the years where AIFRS accounting arrangements have been in place. Please see Note 1 to the Bank’s Financial Statements for further information regarding the impact of AIFRS requirements on these measures.
 |
 |
Long Term Performance
Long term performance is measured on the Bank’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to its peers.
All future LTI grants require the Bank’s performance to reach at least the 51st percentile for 50% of the shares granted to vest. All of the shares granted will only vest if the Bank’s performance reaches the 75th percentile.
2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 LTI Grant Performance
For these LTI grants, the Bank’s relative TSR performance must reach at least the 50th percentile for 50% of the shares granted to vest. All of the shares granted will only vest if the Bank’s performance reaches the 75th percentile.
As at 30 June 2006, the Bank’s performance was tracking under the 50th percentile for the 2002 and 2005 grants. The 2003 grant is currently at the 50th percentile and the 2004 grant has reached the 51st percentile.
Share Price
The Bank’s share price has trended upward over the last five years, with a steeper incline over the last 18 months.

Dividends per Share
The Bank’s dividend per share has increased consistently over the past five years.

Directors’ Remuneration
Ralph Norris (Managing Director and CEO)
Summary of Compensation Arrangements
The Bank appointed Mr Ralph Norris as Managing Director and CEO effective 22 September 2005. Mr Norris’ compensation consists of fixed and variable (at risk) components. For the year ended 30 June 2006, fixed compensation, which comprises base compensation (calculated on a total cost basis and includes any FBT charges related to employee benefits including motor vehicles) as well as employer contributions to superannuation, was 46% of total compensation.
The variable (at risk) compensation consists of short and long-term incentives.
Short Term Incentives (STIs) are delivered in two components: 50% made as an immediate cash payment and 50% in deferred cash. Performance is measured against Key Result Areas, with payment subject to the approval of the Board. The Board has assessed Mr Norris’ performance for the year. The Bank has approved a total STI payment of $1.3 million.
This assessment took into account the following factors:
-
Progress in relation to the Bank’s four strategic priorities of Customer Service, Business Banking, Technology and Operational Excellence and Trust and Team Spirit;
-
Business and financial results;
-
Recruitment and development of top management;
-
Employee engagement initiatives;
-
The Bank’s sales and service culture; and
-
Relationships with external stakeholders including the general community, investors, regulators, Government and the media.
Long Term Incentives (LTIs) are delivered in the form of Reward Shares under the Bank’s Equity Reward Plan, and no value will accrue unless the Bank’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) at least meets the 50th percentile of the comparator group of companies for the 2005 grant and the 51st percentile for the 2006 grant and beyond. At the 2005 Annual General Meeting (AGM), the Board sought and was granted the approval of shareholders for a maximum of $12,000,000 to be allocated to Mr Norris in three tranches prior to the 2007 AGM.
The total variable compensation for the year ended 30 June 2006 was 54% of total compensation.
The Board determines Mr Norris’ compensation, pursuant to the Constitution, as part of the terms and conditions of his appointment. Those terms and conditions are established in a contract of employment with Mr Norris which was effective from 22 September 2005 with compensation subject to review annually by the Board. Mr Norris’ compensation arrangements are detailed on page 59 (Compensation of Directors) and follow the same principles as other Executives except in relation to the Bank seeking shareholder approval of LTI grants.
Mr Norris’ contract provides for no end date, although he may resign at any time by giving six months notice. The Bank may terminate Mr Norris’ employment, in cases other than misconduct, on twelve months notice in his first year of service and six months notice thereafter. In the latter case the Bank will pay all fixed compensation and any outstanding statutory entitlements. Any unvested STI or LTI amounts will be payable at the discretion of the Board.
There is also a provision allowing Mr Norris to terminate the agreement if a material change to his status occurs and to receive benefits as if the Bank had terminated his employment.
On exit from the Bank Mr Norris is entitled to receive his statutory entitlements of accrued annual and long service leave as well as accrued superannuation benefits. This arrangement is the same for all Executives.
Non-Executive Directors
Compensation Arrangements
Compensation for Non-Executive Directors consists of base and committee fees within a maximum of $3,000,000 per annum as approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on 5 November 2004. As indicated at the time of approval the total compensation for Non-Executive Directors is less than that approval. This will allow for additional Board members to be appointed to continue having an appropriate mix of skills and experience as well as to accommodate compensation increases in the future, when justified. No component of Non-Executive Director compensation is contingent upon performance.
On appointment to the Board, Non-Executive Directors enter into a service agreement with the Bank in the form of a letter of appointment. The letter of appointment, a copy of which appears on the Bank's website, summarises the Board policies and terms, including compensation, relevant to the office of Director. All Non-Executive Directors have entered into a form of service agreement.
The policy of the Board is that the aggregate amount of fees should be set at a level which provides the Bank with the necessary degree of flexibility to enable it to attract and retain the services of directors of the highest calibre.
The Board Performance and Renewal Committee annually reviews the fees payable to individual Non-Executive Directors and takes into account relevant factors and, where appropriate, receives external advice on comparable compensation. The Committee decided to defer the review of fees to December 2006.
Non-Executive Directors have 20% of their annual fees applied to the mandatory on-market acquisition of shares in the Bank. In addition, in 2005/06, Non Executive Directors could voluntarily elect to sacrifice up to a further 50% of their fees for the acquisition of shares (the Board subsequently approved the removal of this limit).
The Bank’s Non-Executive Directors’ fee structure provides for a base fee for all Bank Directors of $160,000, and a base Chairman’s fee of $560,000. In addition, amounts are payable where Directors are members of, or chair a Committee. Details of the breakdown of each Non-Executive Directors' fees is provided on page 58. The Bank also contributes to compulsory superannuation on behalf of Non-Executive Directors.
Details of Components of Non-Executive Directors' fees

Retirement Benefits
Under the Directors’ Retirement Allowance Scheme, which was approved by shareholders at the 1997 Annual General Meeting, Directors previously accumulated a retirement benefit on a pro rata basis to a maximum of four years’ total emoluments after twelve years’ service. No benefit accrued until the Director had served three years on the Board. In 2002 the Board decided to discontinue the Directors’ Retirement Allowance Scheme without affecting the entitlements of the then existing Non-Executive Directors. After that time, new Directors have not been entitled to participate in the scheme.
The Board resolved with effect from the 2004 Annual General Meeting to terminate accrual of further benefits under the Scheme and freeze the entitlements of current members until their respective retirements. This approach has resulted in compensation arrangements being expressed in a more transparent manner.
The entitlements of the Non-Executive Directors under the Directors’ Retirement Allowance Scheme are:
Directors' Retirement Allowance Scheme

Compensation of Key Management Personnel and Other Executives
Individual compensation details for Directors for the year ended 30 June 2006 are set out below.
Compensation of Directors

Individual compensation details for Executives for the year ended 30 June 2006 are set out below.
Compensation of Executives

Termination Arrangements
The Bank’s Executive contracts generally provide for severance payments of up to six months in cases where termination of employment is initiated by the Bank, other than for misconduct or unsatisfactory performance. Exceptions to these arrangements apply to Messrs Grimshaw, Cupper and O’Sullivan whose contracts allow for a twelve months severance payment where termination is initiated by the Bank. There is also a four week notice period for either party to terminate the agreement.
The contracts for Key Management Personnel and Other Executives do not have a fixed term.
Upon exit from the Bank, Executives are entitled to receive their statutory entitlements of accrued annual and long service leave, as well as accrued superannuation benefits.
Executives who leave the Bank during a given performance year (i.e. 1 July to 30 June) will generally not receive a STI payment for that year except in the circumstances of retrenchment, retirement or death. In those circumstances, a pro-rated payment may be made based on the length of service during the performance year.
Deferred cash or shares from previous STI awards are usually forfeited where the Executive resigns or is dismissed. In circumstances of retrenchment, retirement or death any cash will generally be paid and unvested shares will generally vest immediately. LTI grants are generally forfeited where the Executive resigns or is dismissed. In circumstances of retrenchment, retirement or death, the Executive or their estate may, at Board discretion, retain a pro-rated grant of long term incentives. Vesting of any long term incentives retained by the Executive will still be subject to the performance hurdle relevant to that grant.
STI Allocations for Executives for the Year ended 30 June 2006

LTI Allocations for Executives for the Year ended 30 June 2006

Equity Holdings of Key Management Personnel and Other Executives
Shareholdings
All shares were acquired by Directors on normal terms and conditions or through the Non-Executive Directors’ Share Plan.
Shares awarded under the Equity Reward Plan and the mandatory component of the Equity Participation Plan are registered in the name of the Trustee. For further details of the Non-Executive Directors’ Share Plan, Equity Reward Plan, previous Executive Option Plan and Equity Participation Plan refer to Note 33 to the Financial Statements.
Details of shareholdings of Key Management Personnel and Other Executives(or close family or entities controlled, jointly controlled, or significantly influenced by them, or any entity over which any of the aforementioned hold significant voting power) are as follows:
Shares held by Directors

Shares held by Executives

Option Holdings

Shares Vested and Options Exercised During the Year

Loans to Key Management Personnel and other Executives
Total Loans to Key Management Personnel and Other Executives

Individual Loans above $100,000 to Key Management Personnel and Other Executives

Terms and Conditions of Loans
All loans to Key Management Personnel and Other Executives (or related entities controlled or significantly influenced by them) have been provided on an arms-length commercial basis including the term of the loan, security required and the interest rate (which may be fixed or variable).
Other Transactions of Key Management Personnel and Other Executives and Related Parties
Financial Instrument Transactions
Financial instrument transactions (other than loans and shares disclosed above) of Key Management Personnel and Other Executives with the Bank and other banks that are controlled entities occur in the ordinary course of business of the banks on an arm’s length basis.
Disclosure of financial instrument transactions regularly made by a bank is limited to disclosure of such transactions with Key Management Personnel and Other Executives and entities controlled or significantly influenced by them.
All such financial instrument transactions that have occurred between the banks and their Key Management Personnel and Other Executives have been trivial or domestic and were in the nature of normal personal banking and deposit transactions.
Transactions other than Financial Instrument Transactions of Banks
All other transactions with Key Management Personnel Other Executives and their related entities and other related parties are conducted on an arm’s length basis in the normal course of business and on commercial terms and conditions. These transactions principally involve the provision of financial and investment services by entities not controlled by the Bank.
The interests of Mr Daniels in investment funds managed by Colonial First State are detailed on page 63.
Mr Galbraith was a partner in the law firm Allens Arthur Robinson to 31 January 2006. Mr Galbraith was a salaried adviser to this law firm from 1 February to 30 June 2006. Allens Arthur Robinson acted for the Bank in the provision of legal services during the financial year. The fees for these services amounted to $2,137,174.
Audit
Certain disclosures required by AASB124 have been made in this Remuneration Report. Pages 51 to 68 of this report have been audited as required.
|